To Watermark or Not To Watermark: That is the question

To Watermark or Not To Watermark: That is the question

I’m often involved in discussions about watermarking photos. Specifically, that I should be watermarking my photos. To me, photographers you’ve got a choice, and the default shouldn’t be the watermark.

  1. Watermark your work, at either a mild or extreme ends of invasiveness
  2. Don’t watermark your work

Legally, one doesn’t need to watermark

People seem to (wrongly) think that a watermark is a sign that the work is copyrighted. Legally, copyright is implied and automatic, so that’s just a common-held misbelief. People also seem to think that work won’t be pinched IF it’s watermarked, or at least they will have a visual reminder that it’s owned by someone. A little “hey, don’t pinch me please” reminder…

My experience is that heavily watermarked work will never be widely seen. Mild watermarks may be seen or shared, but detract from the work, thus reducing people sharing and getting an audience.

Do you want your work to be seen?

To be blunt, if you want your work to be seen, watermarking it is the best approach to have a detrimental impact on that. But, I didn’t always think this way.

I used to do a simple little watermark, cause I somewhat felt the need to protect my work. So I hoped for a little thing down the bottom corner. Here’s an example from a site I used to post at:

Would a company crop a watermark for commercial use?

What do you know? It turns up somewhere. Not some regular kinda blog, but a corporate, commercial website.


Just to see how they’ve cropped this, I’ve done a little overlay.


But to really see how they’ve cropped it, I found the image they originally uploaded.

And then, I’ve overlayed the original image with transparency to see the crop to remove my watermark.

It’s not an accident – it’s pixel perfect…

Licensing photographs

So, when it comes to licensing photographs, a few things are meant to happen. Most obvious is the permission is granted by the original creator. In this instance, this specific company did not have permission. That said, when it comes to licensing, there are a few things to consider in pricing, and these all come down to the terms of use.

Quality of image (‘size’). Is the work presented in high resolution or of a lower resolution? My models of billing usually follow a small (400px), medium (800px), large(1200px), x-large (1600px) and print size (2400px +). Given this is in the x-large range, this would also be a factor. This is the base rate that is also applied to the rate of single or multi-use.

Single-use or multi-use (‘use’). Is the work to be used in one context or many? Is it used in email newsletters, print material, TVCs, SEM campaigns, or just one context?

Duration of license (‘duration’). Is the work to be used for 1 year, 3 years or in perpetuity. Given this image – according to the URL structure from my investigating – was uploaded March 22, 2014, it’s been used for quite some time and would fall in the ‘perpetuity duration’.

Exclusive or non-exclusive (‘exclusivity’). This is a big one, where licenses are granted a premium fee. In essence, once an image is licensed as exclusive, that’s its selling life completed.

Selling rights. Is the work able to be on-sold from the buyer? Similar to the previous exclusivity terms, this is a big one where a premium fee is applied.

So, when it comes to formulating a price, this is some of the information that needs to be considered. In the example above, we’re talking x-large resolution, in perpetuity – at a minimum. As for single-use or multi-use, I think I’ve got a fair claim that this could be used in a range of contexts – it’s not like they approached me for this one. But that’s a little more of a debate.

Either way, as a photographer who invests thousands of hours in time, many thousands of dollars in equipment – this is always very disheartening.

And by the way – the company above; they used to pictures of mine without permission. I’ll be getting in touch.


The New Adobe Lightroom CC. One Step Forward, Two Steps Back.

The New Adobe Lightroom CC. One Step Forward, Two Steps Back.

I’ve been a long time Lightroom user. I’m familiar with shortcut keys, the multi-screen set-up consistent with other Adobe CC products, and I’ve got some high end camera outputs that I put in to the Adobe ecosystem.

This post will discuss the following:

  • Embracing mobility and using the iPad to import and manage pictures
  • Using Lightroom on my Mac
  • Using Lightroom on my iPad

While many people wont jump into Lightroom with such a iPad focus, I kinda had to. My main work Mac was in the shop getting some work.

IF YOU DON’T CARE about iPads click me to hide/toggle the iPad stuff.

Background & recent workflow history

I’ve been traveling around Asia for over a year and my workflow is rather complicated. I’ve got my main Mac where I store my working files, I’m traveling with over 12 terabytes of storage. One of which is a Apple TimeMachine backup. Another harddrive is a manual archive of previous Lightroom Catalogues, along with a back-up archive of that. My Mac’s got a good SSD, but I need more space. I’m also shooting timelapse videos (all from raw images), and I’m also doing plenty of stills. The timelapse shots go in their own Lightroom Catalogue – they don’t belong among my stills. Occasionally I’m shooting video, but not much. I was also using a Lightroom Catalogue to manage my videos. My Sony A7R2 is awesome, and produces some seriously big 42 files. I knew jumping to Adobes Lightroom CC ‘of the future’ (in fact, Lightroom of today) was going to introduce some workflow hurdles, but I’m willing to give things a real go. And what better way to start than my time in Malaysia with a new Lightroom CC Catalogue. So here it is. About a month in.

Of this recent update, I see where Adobe are going with Photography. But it’s not quite ready for the main-stage for serious users.

New Lightroom process – Importing with the iPad Pro

My Malaysia photography workflow has been a full jump in the Adobe CC Lightroom CC ecosystem (how you say that?). To really help me make that leap, I have decided to use my iPad Pro Lightroom CC as the core means of managing and transferring my photos. My Macbook was in repair and thought this is an ideal mobile-first use-case and justification. Honestly, it’s really cool. My iPad fits in more bags than my laptop, the battery is awesome and the screen is wonderful*. And all my pictures are stored online, backed-up using Adobe’s best in-class security (we’ll ignore they were hacked a couple years back, huh?)

* Keen in mind that at night, iPad – as can your Mac – screen tones change (with Night Shift) and that can make colour processing a joke if you get it right at night then look at it in the day.

But the work flow just ain’t quite right. There’s dongles (welcome to the Apple ecosystem), importing then re-importing (from Apple Photos to Lightroom), duplicate files and then associated file management. That said, this process could be used to advantage. I’ll explain. Oh yeah, slow internet.

So, you shoot plenty of pixels on your camera. More than you need. Previewing on your camera is not totally reliable (small screen doesn’t always show if your picture is sharp – for example). Plus deleting pictures on your camera can be slow and risky. Turning dials, pressing menu buttons, over and over… Delete the wrong one? There’s no undo or recycle bin here (not without serious headaches).

Doing an import dump from your camera to an iPad means you’re transferring them to a big-screen device and allows for much, much better reviews. But this presented an issue. All my pictures were pixelated. From 42 megapixel images?

My shooting is 100% raw. I’ve not seen the need for JPEG sidecar files (you know, RAW + JPEG), until now – and JPEG shooting in general? Not since I’ve known a little more about what I’m doing… It seems that without the sidecar files, Apple Photos on the iPad doesn’t render the ARW file, but the tiny embedded thumbnail – which is pixelated to hell. So, now I’m shooting with sidecar JPEG files. Not a major thing, but without them, you can’t really review your pictures and determine if they are sharp. But it’s adding file-size weight to every picture.

Now, I’ve got a great device in the iPad Pro which can allow me to really review my pictures. I delete the non preferred shots, then I’ve got a gallery which I’m happy with. From here, I’ve got to now import them to Lightroom CC.

Double the files

Yep, import twice. Once to the iPad. Once to Lightroom CC. You can’t import direct to Lightroom. But this is where the workflow can have some advantages, if you really look for them. But now, I’ve got two sets of the same images; one in Apple Photos, one in Lightroom. And as soon as they go in Lightroom CC, off they get synced to my 100GB cloud storage. I can pause syncing – if I need. But all imported files head on up to the Adobe servers. And then they sync to my other devices – mobile phone, and now, Lightroom CC on my Mac.

But there’s a little advantage

This little Apple Photos holding zone is such you get to do a good review before importing them. Which then will subsequently block whatever network your own syncing gigabyes in files. Each picture, if a compressed RAW, is 40 odd megabytes. Uncompressed RAW is 80 megabytes. I’m shooting compressed RAW, so if I import 20 pictures – which is pretty normal, I’ve just uploaded almost 1 gigabyte, without really thinking about it. It’s a big payload. Someone else watching netflix? They can wait…

And it’s then all backed up. No running around with extra hard-drives yay! You’ve just now got to delete your Apple Photos. It would be nice if an import in Lightroom could delete the source files, but that’s that.

Wrapping up imports

If you’re disciplined and import pictures to Lightroom and delete them from your Apple Photos catalogue, you could have a pretty robust workflow if you’ve got good internet. But if you cherry pick a couple photos to import, leave them in your Apple Photos catalogue, then -say – get a coffee and forget it. You can get into file management hell, where you’ve some pictures in Lightroom, some in your iPad, and then you need to trash them or just live with the fact your iPad is gonna run out of space. It’s a bit cumbersome.

Using Lightroom CC

Lightroom CC on the Mac

Straight off the bat, it’s super similar to Lightroom CC on the iPad / Android (and the super-cool, and much less like Lightroom CC Classic. It’s currently version 1.1 and it feels like it, whereas Lightroom Classic CC is version 7.1 – and it feels like it’s had a good 6 versions prior.

Import workflows

There’s no drag and drop with the new Lightroom CC. And that’s a pain. And there’s no import dialogue window other than the native OS X ‘Add file’ window. No options to see what’s already been imported to avoid duplicates. Really, there are no options. But that said, once you add in a file, it’s there and will sync up to the server. And each file might be BIG, so make sure you’ve got a good data connection. But for a little more on this exact and import(ant) topic, watch this little thing…

Edit: Jan 22.

In another frustrating discovery, I’ve realised that importing files directly from a SD card will drag in both the RAW image as well as the sidecar JPG file. Yet another disapointment.

Multiscreen productivity

Something I’m very famiialr with across Adobe software is multi-screen support. But not here. No idea why, but something I used a lot – it’s just gone. Not a show-stopped, but it’s a cross.

Edit in…

Like much of Lightroom CC, less is, well, less. No sign of edit with HDR Effects Pro – for example. My Lightroom Classic was pretty well integrated with third party (and Adobe, for that matter) software. I can still edit in Photoshop, but not much more than that is easily supported. I think I need to export as a new file, open elsewhere, edit away, re-import. Clunky turd…


Presets seem much less of a focus in the new Lightroom, but have their place and do their job. Reason for the mention is for the contrast against the mobile version. Let me just say; I can make them on the desktop version. No step forward against Classic, no step back.

Panoramic stitching

It’s not here either. Not a request by any stretch, but it’s not there. I loved this. Big backward step.

Spot removal / Heal tools

They are still here. Thankfully. If they weren’t, it would be see-ya-later. And these setting DO sync up with the iPad / mobile versions.

Keyboard shortcuts

I lived for quick fixes in Lightroom Classic CC. “Q” – I’m right in my spot removal tool. Not in the new Lightroom CC. It’s now “H”. Tab, Shift Tab, “F”, Shift “F” – they are all a little different.

I understand these things change, but they take a bit of getting used to when workflows are so established. In Adobe’s defence, they do highlight short-cuts when you hover over.

Adding Metadata

This is a big one. And a geeky one. But this is really important to me…

First up, I do love that it all syncs up across devices. I can add keywords, tags, titles, copyright – whatever – on my mobile or iPad when I’m on the loo (for example). But it doesn’t seem as obvious as Lightroom Classic. I don’t understand why Keywords has it’s own section, whereas info has it’s own. To me, they are really part of the same workflow. Just a minor pain, where I see this as a minor back-step.

Another little feature that was (is) super handy in Lightroom Classic CC is the auto-fill of metadata when you start filling it in. If I’m in the Copyright field, for example, and I start typing “Steve…” – it should fill out “Steven Wright”, huh?

Exporting For the Web & SEO – Using Metadata

A big reason for all the metadata is to help with you being able to sort and find your own work. But in addition to that, it’s really good data to include IN the file for use online. Copyright, contact details, etc, are very valuable. But on the SEO front, a key feature I used 100% of the time was ‘export as’ where I could use the image title as the file name, as well as my name in the file name. For example, “Petrona Towers – by Steven Wright.jpg”. But now? Can’t do it. Seriously, a big shortcoming. All I’ve got is the original filename, and no options for either include, exclude or anything on the meta-data front.

A massive step back from Lightroom Classic – especially on the SEO front.

When it comes to me living the other part of my life (as a digital freelancer), being able to SEO optimise images EASILY was a real feather in my cap. Now, it’s seriously taken a back step. Not happy with this. This is another reason that I can’t fully commit to Lightroom CC.

Note: Despite the issues around metadata, it’s still stored in your files. But it’s not what I want…

When you import a file to wordpress, that’s exported from Lightroom, fields such as caption and title are pre-populated. This is critical, and implemented. But lack of file-name customisation is a real jerk-move.

Lightroom CC on the iPad

It’s cool. Really cool. But it’s not your main Lightroom life.

First up, once you’ve got over the import headache, it’s awesome. Sliders are responsive, control is good enough (there have been times where I feel I can’t rotate, for example, by .2 degrees – I can get .1 or .3…) and the screen is so nice. The device is portable, I can edit shots right away when I’m waiting for my bus, or whatever.

If you’re a mobile phone tethering type – MAKE SURE you stop your syncing. This little mistake can eat your data plan without any consideration, and fast.


They just don’t exist – you need to copy and paste to get a similar look.

Presets are pretty good, but there not the whole workflow. For me, I’m not a preset and forget type; they are a starting point. So while they aren’t the core part of my workflow, creating my own just doesn’t seem possible. I can copy and past settings (including Spot Removal*), but I don’t want to do that. I just want to either add to the standard presets, delete the ones I don’t use, or just manage it myself? Like on Lightroom Classic! But I can’t… I’ve got to find my picture, copy the settings and paste them like some kind of copy and paste monkey.

*Spot removal / Heal tools

I can copy and paste a spot removal (or heal). How did that even get there? Here’s the real bitch – you can’t do it on the iPad. The finger friendly iPad falls over on this front, Adobe. You can use Photoshop Fix on the iPad, but then you’ve got to export your raw image from Lightroom – lock in all those settings to a destructive JPEG – do the edit, make a new file, re-import, blah-freakin’-blah bullshit. Lightoom CC for iPad is just not finished. Obviously.

So how did it get there to copy and paste? Well, the desktop Lightroom CC DOES have spot removal. And it syncs up. Which is cool, but…

For me, lack of spot removal is a critical show-stopper in moving from a Mac and jumping to the tablet eco-system. Fixing up sensor dust – a sad reality of mirrorless shooting – is critical. But I’ve got a Mac and I’m not dead in the water on that front.

Panoramic stitching

Nope, sorry. Not here. Move on. Or move back, actually. It’s not in the new Lightroom CC, iPad, Android or Desktop. Need to use Lightoom Classic, soz.

This recent Lightroom feature – which is awesome when it works – is a killer feature of the now Lightroom Classic. Producing DNG files is such a sweet feature, meaning edits can happen for real. Not some locked down JPEG.

IF I want a raw panoramic shot, I’ve got to jump in Lightroom Classic, do the render, export the DNG, import the DNG and then I’ve got it. Clunky process, cranky me… Not a show-stopped, but a step back.

Third party plugins / Edit in…

More of a Lightroom CC Classic thing, but none the less, something I’ve got no idea about on the iPad. I don’t think it’s designed with an app eco-system in mind. You need to export, do your thing elsewhere (say Photoshop Fix / HDR software), then import it back.

But there’s a magic feel with Lightroom CC on the iPad

Despite the shortcomings above – especially noticeable having made the jump from a years-old established work-flow – there’s a magic feel to it. When things are good, they are great. Just a little thing – it’s awesome being able to edit on my iPad, it syncs up with my girlfriend who is doing some social posts on our travel blog. Sharing libraries is cool. Being able to post to instagram easily, or social, is cool. And despite the clunky edge cases above, it’s mostly cool.

I just wish the bloody spot-removal / heal tool was in there. I don’t get why it’s not?

In Lightroom CC conclusion

I’m unable to kill of Lightroom Classic and I don’t want to. The reason I’m unable is that firstly, I can’t use the new tools for batch time-lapse processing – it’s not designed or cut-out for it. In addition, I’ve got WAY more than 100GB of previous photos. I’m not sure how Adobe plan to manage this in the future. I can’t even upgrade to beyond 100GB which is a bit of a potential problem.

The major mobile deficiency is spot removal / heal tool, but it’s on the desktop version. The mobile solution to use Adobe FIX is oddly broken, where Adobe need to FIX this…

And time-lapse workflows?

So, for the record, right here – there’s no way I can do this for my time-lapse workflow. No way. Consider 600 raw images – that’s some 24 gigabytes to upload. Almost a quarter of my 100 gigabyte quota. That’s okay – but it’s a strike against the Lightroom CC. iPad or not.

If you’re doing time-lapse – Lightroom CC isn’t up for it.

Other than that, if everything – such as internet – goes right, it’s very good. For now, one month in, that’s my assessment. But long term, I’m unsure to the point of really thinking ‘hang on’…

The RAW Cloud questions

Do Adobe want people to be storing RAW files?

Right now – with no ability to go beyond 100GB storage, I can only store 2,500 photos (as I compress them). If I shot uncompressed, half that number. It’s not enough.

Are ISPs / Internet speeds ready for RAW Cloud storage?

I’m lucky enough to be working from high-speed-internet-serviced areas, where 100 megabits up and down is common. But back in Australia, my home network would seriously crap its dacks.

Final thought

Overall, it’s an awesome platform. But it’s no surprise that Lightroom Classic CC is still around. If Adobe killed it, they’d have some seriously pissed customers. But I’m still worried about my 100gb ceiling. How much will that update cost? If I get dependent on this workflow, what choice will I have for storage? None, I suspect.

I think Lightroom CC would be great for straight-up photographers of lower megapixel cameras. For me, I can use it, but file transfers feel a little silly. It’s plenty of data to move around.

And if you’re wanting to use it as a productivity tool for SEO work – it’s a massive back-step.

But you can still generate some great shots with it…

And now, pictures… All created with Lightroom CC

And note their file-names. Not very search friendly, you wannabe-online-company Adobe…

Week One in Phuket, Thailand

Week One in Phuket, Thailand

Our South East Asia trip started in a really casual manner. First job after getting off our flight ( which was as smooth as you could hope considering we were delayed in Melbourne due to lightning and landed in lightning) was getting to our Airbnb joint. Instructions were a little vague, we were a little tired, but we figured it out. I mean, obviously. Our place was past most of the action of Patong and Karon, down the Southern end of Phuket in a town called Kata. A pretty sweet little find, in hindsight. Continue Reading..

Event Photography, Social Media & Connecting Technology

Event Photography, Social Media & Connecting Technology

Is a picture worth a thousand words on Twitter?
When it comes to Twitter, based on some rough calculations, a picture exceeds the 140 character limit by around 4,850 characters – if a picture is actually worth a thousand words*. The ability to add rich media, or high-end photography can really help serve as the hook to get the attention of your audience when you’re running an event physically and virtually. And this extends to other social platforms (thinking Instagram), too.

I’ve covered a events in varying capacity of photography and social media, where plenty of thought is given to driving engagement and making the physical experience as ‘amplifiable’ as possible online. And that’s the wonderful crossroad of social media and photography.

People love snapping screenshots and being first on Twitter with that amazing insight or graphic. Problem is, many of these environments are poorly lit and getting a great shot isn’t overly simple.

Obviously, photography on mobile phones has greatly advanced in recent years, but so too has the connectivity of modern digital cameras (mirrorless and DSLRs). Here’s me in action (on a pretty standard looking iPhone shot):

You can now shoot a keynote, a presenter, a slide, a room, the guests, an establishment shot – whatever you snap – and using wifi, then sync to your mobile phone allowing you to onward share to the world.

The best part is you can now edit photos on a mobile phone, using some very capable (and free) tools, like Snapseed or VSCOCam. Workflow wise, this can really streamline the ability to get great quality images to the wider world, super fast. It’s almost possible to have professional images, live. For example:

My Experience with Two Social-Photography Scenarios

1) I’m The In-House Social Photographer

I’m able to do it all. I’m shooting, syncing, posting and running the whole show – as in, I’m in the social media team, I’ve got the keys to Twitter, Instagram, Periscope, Facebook and so on.

2) I’m The Photographer for Hire

In this instance, I’m not in the social team, so obtaining access to the social accounts wouldn’t be suitable. That said, this is okay. Because I can shoot, sync, edit – and share to someone in the social team.

Live Photo Sharing with the Social Team

Rather than posting to social, I can share to the social team as-i-shoot, providing a stream of high-end pictures which can then be posted from the company Twitter handle. But there are a few ways to make this happen, but you need to be mindful of the shortcomings of each.

DropBox / Google Drive

This is a great solution that allows for a simple sync from my mobile phone to a cloud sharing service. Prior to the event kicking off, I create the folder and share that folder with the social team. Once the social team has access (on their mobile phone or laptop), they have immediate access when I sync.

When to use DropBox or Google Drive?
If the social manager is familiar with either of these platforms, I’ll run with this approach. It’s fast and simple. I find this works best when the social team has a laptop, but can well on mobile too.

Facebook Moments

Moments is a really simple app that allows for high resolution image sharing between two Facebook ‘friends’. It’s a app that you can only use on a mobile phone. The person in the social team gets notified of a new photo, which is a big tick against the Drive & Dropbox solutions.

When to use Facebook Moments?
If the social team is a Facebook friend and they are roving on their mobile, Moments is perfect. The picture gets received with a notification and they can save and share when ready.


Email’s a bit clunky, but it still serves a purpose. Some of the shortcomings of email are pictures are often resized – it’s sometimes hard to control this. Equally, email inboxes can be a little cluttered and it’s not built-for-purpose, as much as Moments, Drive and Dropbox are.

When to use Email?

When Drive, DropBox and Moments don’t do the trick.

Messenger Services (Facebook / SMS / IM)

These tools are often geared towards general communication, not the transfer of files. That said, they often run over 3/4G technology, so can be the last plan of attack. Pictures can be resized and reduced without any control.

When to use Messenger Services?
When all else fails…

What Next?

You’ve got two options. 1) Give this a go yourself, or 2), if you’re looking for an event photographer with technical and social experience, I’m available for bookings – see or search for @regularsteven – I’m all over the web 🙂

I’ve got the artistic experience to capture an event in its best light and have the technical and social experience to bring it to life in real-time. I quote fixed costs, with the social aspects included. Costs include delivery of all edited photographs in the following 2 days of the event.

Quick Note: All photography gets the professional editing treatment in post production for a broader gallery. But, the social side is a big value add!

Last up, if there are suitable photos (local landscape, establishment architecture, etc) that align with my broader style of shared photography, I’m happy to share this with my 10,000+ audience across my social channels along with a brand mention of ‘Shooting the <YourBrand+Event>’. This might be a little brand boost that could be a little tick – if you’re looking for a sweetener.

* Based on average of 5 characters per word

Have a little look for some social examples of my work in action…

I’ve taken the plunge & I’m starting a small business…

I've taken the plunge & I'm starting a small business...

I’ve worked for other people and companies all my life. It’s been great. I’ve got almost 15 years experience working in tech companies from small business, start ups to large enterprise. I’ve worked on big client facing projects in both B2B and B2C, as well as back end systems that aren’t directly visible on the outside. In the past 8 or so years though, I’ve diversified with regards to what I’m passionate about. Continue Reading..

Framing Federation Square

Framing Federation Square

Over the space of a few weeks, I was lucky enough to do the first Instagram Takeover of Federation Square. If you’re not aware, Fed Square sits right next to Flinders Street Station, and really is the meeting place of Melbourne. It was great to get some special access of this iconic Melbourne landmark, but equally awesome to get to eat my way around and get to know it a little better. Continue Reading..

Melbourne in 150 Megapixels

Melbourne in 150 Megapixels

Free Melbourne photo download and a thought about the future

Panoramic Yarra Views
Panoramic Yarra Views

If you’d like the full 150 megapixel resolution image, for non commercial use, download Melbourne in High Resolution right now. If you use it, please let me know. Either on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook or link to this It’s 33 megabyte file, so best not do this on your mobile. You can print this as big as you like if you like. Please, just don’t sell it or use it for commercial purposes.

As for the quality, here’s the picture at 100%. You can crop in almost anywhere and figure out how to frame a shot. Over and over, a new picture can be found – the quality is crazy!

Panoramic Yarra Views
Panoramic Yarra Views

And, not only, but this picture is cropped down from 330 megapixels. Check out the full view of what I captured while standing in the rain.

Panoramic Yarra Views
Panoramic Yarra Views

The potential detail you can get with consumer cameras is remarkable. This is a photo that has been generated from 50 individual shots, each taken at the same settings, each shot with some overlap from the previous photo, and then stitched up using Adobe Lightroom (actually very easy – select the shots, press Control+M, and it’s almost done). Each shot was captured at 70mm, which is rather tight, but I did that to try preserve straight lines while allowing for a ultra sized end picture result.

You could say this process is a hack. Sometimes, hacks lead to the future.

It’s me using tools to make for shortcomings in technology, but over time, this will change. I’m an early adopter with photography, but these kind of hacks and results are often what drive future technology.

In the future, there’s going to be all sorts of advancements in photography to the point that photography, as an art that it is today, will die. Or perhaps evolve…

There will always be those with an eye for a shot and an ability to compose on the fly to the point it’s second nature. But as technology advances, the need for those skills while on shoot are going to become less relevant with the progressing technology in post production.

Say you’ve got a camera that captures the following at:

  • More resolution than you need
    • This would give the ability to crop the shot you’d like in post, if you shoot wide enough
  • More focal points & depths of focus points than you need (i.e. multi
    • This would give you the ability to select which are you would like to focus on in post. Look at what Lytro are doing (at least trying).
  • A 360 degree field of view
    • This would allow you to crop in the section you like.
  • Multiple exposures all captured automatically
    • This would allow for shade and highlights to be manipulated easily – no issue of over or under exposed shots.

Now, my little future thought has issues. For example, portability with regards to optical quality. There are some rules of physics (with regards to light & capturing it) that will be very challenging. Equally, things such as barrel distortion make for surreal looking pictures (think of fish-eye), but again, this will increasingly be less of an issue; barrel distortion is getting better in consumer post production tools, and it’s only a matter of time.

What do you think? Will photography, as it is today, die?

Melbourne White Night 2016 – Time-lapse and Photos

Melbourne White Night 2016 - Time-lapse and Photos

White Night 2016

White Night 2016 has happened and it’s been huge. I’ve been to a number of them, but this was the second time that I headed along with the sole goal of documenting it via time-lapse. The only downside to all this is there are some parts that I just can’t get access to. Looking online, there’s some great shots of the Melbourne Baths and the La Trobe Reading Room at the State Library, but for what this is worth, I hope it gives some idea. So here we go, Melbourne on February 20, 2016, like you rarely see it.

Watch the Night in 2 minutes

I’m up on Facebook, too…

I’ve also got a video up on Facebook – check out the direct link to watch it on Facebook.

White Night 2015 – How do they compare

To see for yourself, check out Melbourne White Night 2015 time-lapse and photos. See if you can tell which one I preferred…

Kicking of my Daily Picture Project 2016 – Week 1

Kicking of my Daily Picture Project 2016 - Week 1

I’ve decided to ramp up my photography in 2016, so I’ve kicked off with a bold plan. I want to take a photo a day and share it that same day on Sounds pretty simple, if quality isn’t a goal, but I’m really hoping that I can snap and share something that I’m actually happy with. I’m a bit fussy with my shots; In the past you might see a picture that is cherry picked from 50 (sometimes more, sometimes less). So this project is hopefully going to push me to sharpen up what I shoot and put me under pressure to show what works, and perhaps what doesn’t.

This week has kicked off and I’ve hit every day with something I’m happy with. Some of the days I’ve captured a few shot that I’m pretty chuffed with, and one day (Jan 6 ) where I needed to give it a second crack.

I’m also hoping to get it up on Facebook pretty quickly. So while I might snap something in the morning, I’ll hopefully get it live that morning. Wont always be possible, but that’s the goal.

I hope you enjoy the effort that I’m putting in. It’s gonna have some misses – I know that. But fingers crossed it lets me find another gear and allows me to get some diversity in to my work.

So here we are; Week 1. Some of these were selected for my Facebook page, some have yet to be seen. Feel free to use for your own personal use in a digital sense, such as a wallpaper / screensaver. If you’d like to obtain higher resolution, please hit me up via

Big League at the Catfish

Big League at the Catfish

You know when you see friends on stage, and you’re just so happy for them? I’m not trying to be sucky or anything like that, but it’s always great to see people you love just doing what they love, while entertaining a bunch of friends and strangers alike. When I turned up, I knew I was a little late, but I didn’t know if Big Leage had started yet. I was queuing up, I heard music, but I thought “all good, that’s just the CD…” but it was Big League. They were great.

Check em out on Facebook or Soundcloud